Beyond Right and Wrong [recurso electrónico] : The Power of Effective Decision Making for Attorneys and Clients / by Randall Kiser.
Tipo de material: TextoEditor: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010Descripción: XIII, 444 p. online resourceTipo de contenido: text Tipo de medio: computer Tipo de portador: online resourceISBN: 9783642038143Tema(s): Law | Law -- Philosophy | Civil Law | Industrial management | Law | Law Theory/Law Philosophy | Civil Procedure Law | Operations Research/Decision Theory | Management/Business for ProfessionalsFormatos físicos adicionales: Printed edition:: Sin títuloClasificación CDD: 340.1 Clasificación LoC:K201-487B65K140-165Recursos en línea: Libro electrónicoTipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura | Copia número | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Libro Electrónico | Biblioteca Electrónica | Colección de Libros Electrónicos | K201 -487 (Browse shelf(Abre debajo)) | 1 | No para préstamo | 373586-2001 |
Navegando Biblioteca Electrónica Estantes, Código de colección: Colección de Libros Electrónicos Cerrar el navegador de estanterías (Oculta el navegador de estanterías)
K1001 -1395 The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea | K1001 -1395 Wilful Misconduct in International Transport Law | K1001 -1395 Odious Debt | K201 -487 Beyond Right and Wrong | K201 -487 On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication | K201 -487 Semiotics of International Law | K201 -487 The New Faces of Victimhood |
EVIDENCE -- Prior Research on Attorney-Litigant Decision Making -- A Current Assessment of Attorney-Litigant Decision Making In Adjudicated Cases -- CAUSES -- Psychological Attributes of Decision Errors -- Institutional Impediments to Effective Legal Decision Making -- CONSEQUENCES -- Legal Malpractice Liability For Settlement Counseling and Decision Errors -- Ethical Implications of Attorney-Client Counseling and Decision Making -- SOLUTIONS -- Obstacles to Becoming an Expert Decision Maker -- Personal Expertise in Legal Decision Making -- Group Expertise In Legal Decision Making -- Peer Review, Client Evaluations and Law Firm Audits -- Conclusion.
Let us endeavor to see things as they are, and then enquire whether we ought to complain. Whether to see life as it is, will give us much consolation, I know not; but the consolation which is drawn from truth if any there be, is solid and durable: that which may be derived from errour, must be, like its original, fallacious and fugitive. Samuel Johnson, Letter to Bennet Langton (1758) Attorneys and clients make hundreds of decisions in every litigation case. From initially deciding which attorney to retain to deciding which witnesses to call at trial, from deciding whether to ?le a complaint to deciding whether to appeal a verdict, attorneys and clients make multiple, critical decisions about strategies, costs, arguments, valuations, evidence and negotiations. Once made, these de- sions are scrutinized by an opponent intent on exploiting the consequences of any mistake. In this intense and adversarial arena, decision-making errors often are transparent, irreversible and dispositive, wielding the power to bankrupt clients and dissolve law ?rms. Although attorneys and clients may regard sound decision making as incidental to effective lawyering, sound decision making actually is the essence of effective lawyering. An attorney’s knowledge, intelligence and experience are inert re- urces until the attorney decides how to deploy those skills to serve the client’s interests. Those decisions, in turn, largely determine a case’s course and outcome.
19