Academic evaluation : review genres in university settings / edited by Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani.

Colaborador(es): Hyland, Ken [ed.] | Diani, Giuliana [ed.]Tipo de material: Texto

TextoDetalles de publicación: Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2009Descripción: vii, 245 p. : il. ; 23 cmISBN: 9780230224339 (alk. paper); 0230224334 (alk. paper)Tema(s): Escritos académicos | Crítica literaria | Academic writing -- Reviews | Book reviewing | CriticismClasificación CDD: 808/.066028 Clasificación LoC:P301.5.A27 | A24 2009

Contenidos:

Negotiating research values across review genres: a case study in applied linguistics / Davide Simone Giannoni -- Reviewing science in an information-overloaded world / Judy Noguchi -- Literature reviews in applied Ph.D. theses: evidence and problems / Paul Thompson -- Back cover blurbs: puff pieces and windows on cultural values / Helen Basturkmen -- Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: a cross-disciplinary study / Giuliana Diani -- Discipline and gender: constructing rhetorical identity in book reviews / Polly Tse, Ken Hyland -- Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: a corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines / Nicholas Groom -- (non-)critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: a cross-cultural study of evaluation / Rosa Lorés Sanz -- Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: critical comments and rhetorical structure / Ana I. Moreno and Lorena Suárez -- Historians at work: reporting frameworks in English and Italian book review articles / Marina Bondi -- On the dynamic nature of genre: a diachronic study of blurbs / Maria-Lluïsa Gea-Valor, Marta Inigo Ros -- The lexis and grammar of explicit evaluation in academic book reviews, 1913 and 1993 / Philip Shaw.

Resumen: Summary from OCLC: Academic criticism can be highly fraught and threatening, potentially wounding to the reviewed author and disruptive to the discipline, but it occurs routinely in review genres. This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others' work. Focusing on blurbs, book reviews, review articles, and literature reviews, the international contributors to the volume show how writers manage to critically engage with others' ideas, argue their own viewpoints, and establish academic credibility while simultaneously navigating these risky interactions.

Existencias ( 1 )
Notas de título ( 6 )

Existencias
Tipo de ítem	Biblioteca actual	Colección	Signatura	Copia número	Estado	Fecha de vencimiento	Código de barras
Libro	Biblioteca Central Tijuana	Acervo General	P301.5.A27 A24 2009 (Browse shelf(Abre debajo))	1	Disponible		TIJ116130

Navegando Biblioteca Central Tijuana Estantes, Código de colección: Acervo General Cerrar el navegador de estanterías (Oculta el navegador de estanterías)

Previo								Siguiente
Previo	P301.5 .P47 T3518 La cultura de la polemica :	P301.5 .P47 T3518 La cultura de la polemica :	P301.5.A27 A23 2006 Academic discourse across disciplines /	P301.5.A27 A24 2009 Academic evaluation : review genres in university settings /	P301.5.A27 H95 2009 Academic discourse :	P301.5.M48 C35 2008 The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought /	P301.5.M48 C35 2008 The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought /	Siguiente

Incluye referencias bibliográficas e índices.

Summary from OCLC: Academic criticism can be highly fraught and threatening, potentially wounding to the reviewed author and disruptive to the discipline, but it occurs routinely in review genres. This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others' work. Focusing on blurbs, book reviews, review articles, and literature reviews, the international contributors to the volume show how writers manage to critically engage with others' ideas, argue their own viewpoints, and establish academic credibility while simultaneously navigating these risky interactions.

CveAsig: 40069;

ProgEdu: 79001;

AresCon: SOCIALES;