Automatic Syntactic Analysis Based on Selectional Preferences [electronic resource] / by Alexander Gelbukh, Hiram Calvo.

Por: Gelbukh, Alexander [author.]Colaborador(es): Calvo, Hiram [author.] | SpringerLink (Online service)Tipo de material: TextoTextoSeries Studies in Computational Intelligence ; 765Editor: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2018Edición: 1st ed. 2018Descripción: VIII, 165 p. online resourceTipo de contenido: text Tipo de medio: computer Tipo de portador: online resourceISBN: 9783319740546Tema(s): Computational intelligence | Computational linguistics | Natural language processing (Computer science) | Artificial intelligence | Computational Intelligence | Computational Linguistics | Natural Language Processing (NLP) | Artificial IntelligenceFormatos físicos adicionales: Printed edition:: Sin título; Printed edition:: Sin título; Printed edition:: Sin títuloClasificación CDD: 006.3 Clasificación LoC:Q342Recursos en línea: Libro electrónicoTexto
Contenidos:
Introduction -- First approach: sentence analysis using rewriting rules -- Second approach: constituent grammars -- Third approach: dependency trees -- Evaluation of the dependency parser -- Applications -- Prepositional phrase attachment disambiguation -- The unsupervised approach: grammar induction -- Multiple argument handling -- The need for full co-occurrence.
En: Springer Nature eBookResumen: This book describes effective methods for automatically analyzing a sentence, based on the syntactic and semantic characteristics of the elements that form it. To tackle ambiguities, the authors use selectional preferences (SP), which measure how well two words fit together semantically in a sentence. Today, many disciplines require automatic text analysis based on the syntactic and semantic characteristics of language and as such several techniques for parsing sentences have been proposed. Which is better? In this book the authors begin with simple heuristics before moving on to more complex methods that identify nouns and verbs and then aggregate modifiers, and lastly discuss methods that can handle complex subordinate and relative clauses. During this process, several ambiguities arise. SP are commonly determined on the basis of the association between a pair of words. However, in many cases, SP depend on more words. For example, something (such as grass) may be edible, depending on who is eating it (a cow?). Moreover, things such as popcorn are usually eaten at the movies, and not in a restaurant. The authors deal with these phenomena from different points of view.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Copia número Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Libro Electrónico Biblioteca Electrónica
Colección de Libros Electrónicos 1 No para préstamo

Acceso multiusuario

Introduction -- First approach: sentence analysis using rewriting rules -- Second approach: constituent grammars -- Third approach: dependency trees -- Evaluation of the dependency parser -- Applications -- Prepositional phrase attachment disambiguation -- The unsupervised approach: grammar induction -- Multiple argument handling -- The need for full co-occurrence.

This book describes effective methods for automatically analyzing a sentence, based on the syntactic and semantic characteristics of the elements that form it. To tackle ambiguities, the authors use selectional preferences (SP), which measure how well two words fit together semantically in a sentence. Today, many disciplines require automatic text analysis based on the syntactic and semantic characteristics of language and as such several techniques for parsing sentences have been proposed. Which is better? In this book the authors begin with simple heuristics before moving on to more complex methods that identify nouns and verbs and then aggregate modifiers, and lastly discuss methods that can handle complex subordinate and relative clauses. During this process, several ambiguities arise. SP are commonly determined on the basis of the association between a pair of words. However, in many cases, SP depend on more words. For example, something (such as grass) may be edible, depending on who is eating it (a cow?). Moreover, things such as popcorn are usually eaten at the movies, and not in a restaurant. The authors deal with these phenomena from different points of view.

UABC ; Temporal ; 01/01/2021-12/31/2023.

Con tecnología Koha