TY  - BOOK
AU  - Hyland,Ken
AU  - Diani,Giuliana
TI  - Academic evaluation: review genres in university settings 
SN  - 9780230224339 (alk. paper)
AV  - P301.5.A27 A24 2009
U1  - 808/.066028 22
PY  - 2009///
CY  - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York
PB  - Palgrave Macmillan
KW  - Escritos académicos
KW  - lemb
KW  - Crítica literaria
KW  - Academic writing
KW  - Reviews
KW  - Book reviewing
KW  - Criticism
N1  - Incluye referencias bibliográficas e índices; Negotiating research values across review genres: a case study in applied linguistics / Davide Simone Giannoni -- Reviewing science in an information-overloaded world / Judy Noguchi -- Literature reviews in applied Ph.D. theses: evidence and problems / Paul Thompson -- Back cover blurbs: puff pieces and windows on cultural values / Helen Basturkmen -- Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: a cross-disciplinary study / Giuliana Diani -- Discipline and gender: constructing rhetorical identity in book reviews / Polly Tse, Ken Hyland -- Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: a corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines / Nicholas Groom -- (non-)critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: a cross-cultural study of evaluation / Rosa Lorés Sanz -- Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: critical comments and rhetorical structure / Ana I. Moreno and Lorena Suárez -- Historians at work: reporting frameworks in English and Italian book review articles / Marina Bondi -- On the dynamic nature of genre: a diachronic study of blurbs / Maria-Lluïsa Gea-Valor, Marta Inigo Ros -- The lexis and grammar of explicit evaluation in academic book reviews, 1913 and 1993 / Philip Shaw
N2  - Summary from OCLC: Academic criticism can be highly fraught and threatening, potentially wounding to the reviewed author and disruptive to the discipline, but it occurs routinely in review genres. This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others' work. Focusing on blurbs, book reviews, review articles, and literature reviews, the international contributors to the volume show how writers manage to critically engage with others' ideas, argue their own viewpoints, and establish academic credibility while simultaneously navigating these risky interactions
ER  -