000 03771nam a22005175i 4500
001 u370335
003 SIRSI
005 20160812080027.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2010 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9780387896700
_9978-0-387-89670-0
040 _cMX-MeUAM
050 4 _aJA1-92
082 0 4 _a320
_223
100 1 _aKoo, Min Gyo.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aIsland Disputes and Maritime Regime Building in East Asia
_h[recurso electrónico] :
_bBetween a Rock and a Hard Place /
_cby Min Gyo Koo.
264 1 _aNew York, NY :
_bSpringer New York,
_c2010.
300 _aXX, 208p. 17 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aThe Political Economy of the Asia Pacific,
_x1866-6507
505 0 _aEast Asian Island and Maritime Disputes in a World of Globalization -- Conceptual and Theoretical Framework -- Quantitative Analysis of East Asian Island Disputes -- The Island and Maritime Disputes in the East Sea/Sea of Japan -- The Island and Maritime Disputes in the East China Sea -- The Island and Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea -- Maritime Regime Building in East Asia -- Conclusion and Implications.
520 _aThis book explores the three most prominent island disputes in East Asia: the Dokdo/Takeshima, the Senkaku/Diaoyu, and the Paracel and Spratly disputes. These island disputes clearly illustrate the puzzling pattern of continuity and mutual restraint in East Asia’s territorial conflicts. In dealing with sovereignty issues, East Asian countries have engaged in varied patterns of diplomatic and military behaviors. In some cases, one can find examples of the aggressive use of military force and intransigent bargaining strategies, while in others military inaction and accommodative diplomacy are equally evident. When and why do disputants pursue conflictual policies? Conversely, why do they at other times seek the containment, if not the resolution, of territorial disputes by shelving thorny sovereignty issues? This book uses a territorial bargaining game framework to analyze various stages of dispute initiation, escalation, and de-escalation in a consistent and systematic manner. It starts from an assumption that territory involves mixed motive games, which can be characterized as having elements of partnership, competition, and conflict. Consistent with conventional wisdom, this book finds that the combination of resource competition, fluid geopolitics, and unstable domestic power dynamics has regularly brought about the initiation and escalation of the three island disputes. More importantly, this book discovers that the pacific influence of economic interdependence has repeatedly prevented the sovereignty disputes from escalating into a full-scale diplomatic and/or military crisis
650 0 _aSocial sciences.
650 0 _aEconomics.
650 0 _aDevelopment Economics.
650 0 _aInternational economics.
650 0 _aRegional economics.
650 0 _aPolitical science.
650 1 4 _aSocial Sciences.
650 2 4 _aPolitical Science.
650 2 4 _aDevelopment Economics.
650 2 4 _aInternational Economics.
650 2 4 _aEconomics general.
650 2 4 _aRegional/Spatial Science.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9780387896694
830 0 _aThe Political Economy of the Asia Pacific,
_x1866-6507
856 4 0 _zLibro electrónico
_uhttp://148.231.10.114:2048/login?url=http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-89670-0
596 _a19
942 _cLIBRO_ELEC
999 _c198215
_d198215