000			03244nam a22003735i 4500
001			u373857
003			SIRSI
005			20160812084206.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100427s2010 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783642107993 _9978-3-642-10799-3
040			_cMX-MeUAM
100	1		_aGrover, Sonja C. _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe European Court of Human Rights as a Pathway to Impunity for International Crimes _h[recurso electrónico] / _cby Sonja C. Grover.
264		1	_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg, _c2010.
300			_aXXV, 298 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aI: Selected Factors Facilitating Impunity for International Crimes Through the European Court of Human Rights -- II: The European Court of Human Rights’ Reluctance to Classify European Convention Violations as International Crimes Even When Those Violations Likely Constitute ‘Genocide’ or ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ in Times of Peace or in Immediate Post-conflict Periods -- III: The European Court of Human Rights’ Reluctance to Classify European Convention Violations as International Crimes Even When Those Violations Likely Constitute ‘War Crimes’ or ‘Crimes Against Humanity in Times of Armed Conflict’ -- IV: The Importance of Moral Legitimacy in International Human Rights Court Rulings.
520			_aIntroductory Remarks on the Perspective and Intent of the Author in Writing This Monograph The European Court of Human Rights comments in the judgment Korbely v. Hungary that: However, clearly drafted a legal provision may be, in any system of law, including criminal law, there is an inevitable element of judicial interpretation. There will always be a need for elucidation of doubtful points and for adaptation to changing circumstances. Indeed, in the Convention States, the progressive development of the criminal law through judicial law making is a well-entrenched and necessary part of legal tradition…The Court’s role is con?ned to ascertaining whether the effects of such an interpretation [interpretation by the national courts and authorities of domestic law which sometimes may refer to or incor- rate international law principles or agreements] are compatible with the Convention 1 [European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] (emphasis added). This book then examines to what degree this “inevitable element of judicial interpretation” has been applied by the European Court of Human Rights in a manner consistent with the guarantees of the most fundamental human rights under international criminal, human rights and humanitarian law.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aPublic law.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aEuropean Law/Public International Law.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783642107979
856	4	0	_zLibro electrónico _uhttp://148.231.10.114:2048/login?url=http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-10799-3
596			_a19
942			_cLIBRO_ELEC
999			_c201737 _d201737