000 03401nam a22004935i 4500
001 u376291
003 SIRSI
005 20160812084405.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110715s2011 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783642215094
_9978-3-642-21509-4
040 _cMX-MeUAM
050 4 _aK1001-1395
082 0 4 _a346.07
_223
100 1 _aDamar, Duygu.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aWilful Misconduct in International Transport Law
_h[recurso electrónico] /
_cby Duygu Damar.
264 1 _aBerlin, Heidelberg :
_bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg,
_c2011.
300 _aXXII, 316p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aHamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg,
_x1614-2462 ;
_v22
505 0 _aIntroduction -- Historical Background: Limitation of Liability and Wilful Misconduct -- Roots of Wilful Misconduct -- Wilful Misconduct in Transport Law: First Time in an International Transport Convention: Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules relating to International Carriage by Air, 1929 -- Carriage by Sea -- Conventions on Other Means of Transportation -- Proof & Concept of Fault: Causation and Proof -- Degrees of Fault and Wilful Misconduct -- Conclusion. .
520 _aThe main rationale of the conventions on international transport law is to limit the liability of the carrier. However, an aspect common to these conventions is that in cases of "wilful misconduct" the carrier is liable without any financial limitation. "Wilful misconduct" denoting a high degree of fault is an established term in English law. The Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules relating to International Carriage by Air (Warsaw Convention) of 1929 was the first international convention on transport law where the term was employed. A definition of "wilful misconduct", which can be found in later conventions regarding carriage of goods and passengers as well, was implemented in the Hague Protocol of 1955, amending the Warsaw Convention. However, the question as to exactly which degree of fault constitutes "wilful misconduct" has to date remained controversial and unanswered. This work seeks to answer this question. To this end, the historical background of the term, together with its function and role in marine insurance law, case law and international transport law, are examined from a comparative perspective.
650 0 _aLaw.
650 0 _aCivil law.
650 0 _aCommercial law.
650 0 _aCivil Law.
650 0 _aComparative law.
650 1 4 _aLaw.
650 2 4 _aCommercial Law.
650 2 4 _aCivil Law.
650 2 4 _aCivil Procedure Law.
650 2 4 _aInternational & Foreign Law/Comparative Law.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783642215087
830 0 _aHamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg,
_x1614-2462 ;
_v22
856 4 0 _zLibro electrónico
_uhttp://148.231.10.114:2048/login?url=http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-21509-4
596 _a19
942 _cLIBRO_ELEC
999 _c204171
_d204171