000 | 03064nam a22005535i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | u378048 | ||
003 | SIRSI | ||
005 | 20160812084534.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 101013s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9789048195886 _9978-90-481-9588-6 |
||
040 | _cMX-MeUAM | ||
050 | 4 | _aK201-487 | |
050 | 4 | _aB65 | |
050 | 4 | _aK140-165 | |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a340.1 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aGabbay, Dov M. _eeditor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aApproaches to Legal Rationality _h[recurso electrónico] / _cedited by Dov M. Gabbay, Patrice Canivez, Shahid Rahman, Alexandre Thiercelin. |
264 | 1 |
_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands : _bImprint: Springer, _c2011. |
|
300 |
_aX, 422 p. _bonline resource. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
490 | 1 |
_aLogic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ; _v20 |
|
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Abstracts -- Part I The Specificity of Legal Reasoning -- Part II Legal Reasoning and Public Reason -- Part III Logic and Law -- Part IV New Formal Approaches to Legal Reasoning -- Part V Logic in the Law. | |
520 | _aLegal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are many approaches to legal argumentation. Each of them provides specific insights into highly complex phenomena. Different disciplines, but also different traditions in disciplines (e.g. analytical and continental traditions in philosophy) find here a rare occasion to meet. The present book contains contributions, both historical and thematic, from leading researchers in several of the most important approaches to legal rationality. One of the main issues is the relation between logic and law: the way logic is actually used in law, but also the way logic can make law explicit. An outstanding group of philosophers, logicians and jurists try to meet this issue. The book is more than a collection of papers. However different their respective conceptual tools may be, the authors share a common conception: legal argumentation is a specific argumentation context. | ||
650 | 0 | _aLaw. | |
650 | 0 | _aPhilosophy (General). | |
650 | 0 | _aLogic. | |
650 | 0 | _aArtificial intelligence. | |
650 | 1 | 4 | _aLaw. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aLogic. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aHistory of Philosophy. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aPolitical Science, general. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aArtificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics). |
700 | 1 |
_aCanivez, Patrice. _eeditor. |
|
700 | 1 |
_aRahman, Shahid. _eeditor. |
|
700 | 1 |
_aThiercelin, Alexandre. _eeditor. |
|
710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9789048195879 |
830 | 0 |
_aLogic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ; _v20 |
|
856 | 4 | 0 |
_zLibro electrónico _uhttp://148.231.10.114:2048/login?url=http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-90-481-9588-6 |
596 | _a19 | ||
942 | _cLIBRO_ELEC | ||
999 |
_c205928 _d205928 |