000 03295nam a22004935i 4500
001 u378523
003 SIRSI
005 20160812084557.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 110803s2011 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400714977
_9978-94-007-1497-7
040 _cMX-MeUAM
050 4 _aK201-487
050 4 _aB65
050 4 _aK140-165
082 0 4 _a340.1
_223
100 1 _aCasellas, Núria.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aLegal Ontology Engineering
_h[recurso electrónico] :
_bMethodologies, Modelling Trends, and the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge /
_cby Núria Casellas.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands,
_c2011.
300 _aXXII, 298 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aLaw, Governance and Technology Series ;
_v3
505 0 _a1 Introduction -- 2 On Ontologies -- 3 Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Ontology Design -- 4 Legal Ontologies -- 5 Modelling Judicial Professional Knowledge: A Case Study -- 6 Some Final Remarks and Issues for Discussion -- References -- Index.
520 _aEnabling information interoperability, fostering legal knowledge usability and reuse, enhancing legal information search, in short, formalizing the complexity of  legal knowledge to enhance legal knowledge management are challenging tasks, for which different solutions and lines of research have been proposed. During the last decade, research and applications based on the use of legal ontologies as a technique to represent legal knowledge has raised a very interesting debate about their capacity and limitations to represent conceptual structures in the legal domain. Making conceptual legal knowledge explicit would support the development of a web of legal knowledge, improve communication, create trust and enable and support open data, e-government and e-democracy activities. Moreover, this explicit knowledge is also relevant to the formalization of software agents and the shaping of virtual institutions and multi-agent systems or environments. This book explores the use of ontologism in legal knowledge representation for semantically-enhanced legal knowledge systems or web-based applications. In it, current methodologies, tools and languages used for ontology development are revised, and the book includes an exhaustive revision of existing ontologies in the legal domain. The development of the Ontology of Professional Judicial Knowledge (OPJK) is presented as a case study.
650 0 _aLaw.
650 0 _aPhilosophy of law.
650 0 _aInformation systems.
650 0 _aLaw
_xPhilosophy.
650 1 4 _aLaw.
650 2 4 _aLaw Theory/Law Philosophy.
650 2 4 _aInformation Systems and Communication Service.
650 2 4 _aPhilosophy of Law.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789400714960
830 0 _aLaw, Governance and Technology Series ;
_v3
856 4 0 _zLibro electrónico
_uhttp://148.231.10.114:2048/login?url=http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-007-1497-7
596 _a19
942 _cLIBRO_ELEC
999 _c206403
_d206403