| 000 | 02987cam a2200373 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | u387330 | ||
| 003 | SIRSI | ||
| 005 | 20240918125538.0 | ||
| 008 | 091013s2009 enka frb 001 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | _a 2009041359 | ||
| 020 | _a9780230224339 (alk. paper) | ||
| 020 | _a0230224334 (alk. paper) | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dYDX _dDLC |
||
| 050 | 0 |
_aP301.5.A27 _bA24 2009 |
|
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a808/.066028 _222 |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aAcademic evaluation : _breview genres in university settings / _cedited by Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani. |
| 260 |
_aHoundmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; _aNew York : _bPalgrave Macmillan, _c2009. |
||
| 300 |
_avii, 245 p. : _bil. ; _c23 cm. |
||
| 504 | _aIncluye referencias bibliográficas e índices. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aNegotiating research values across review genres: a case study in applied linguistics / Davide Simone Giannoni -- Reviewing science in an information-overloaded world / Judy Noguchi -- Literature reviews in applied Ph.D. theses: evidence and problems / Paul Thompson -- Back cover blurbs: puff pieces and windows on cultural values / Helen Basturkmen -- Reporting and evaluation in English book review articles: a cross-disciplinary study / Giuliana Diani -- Discipline and gender: constructing rhetorical identity in book reviews / Polly Tse, Ken Hyland -- Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: a corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines / Nicholas Groom -- (non-)critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: a cross-cultural study of evaluation / Rosa Lorés Sanz -- Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: critical comments and rhetorical structure / Ana I. Moreno and Lorena Suárez -- Historians at work: reporting frameworks in English and Italian book review articles / Marina Bondi -- On the dynamic nature of genre: a diachronic study of blurbs / Maria-Lluïsa Gea-Valor, Marta Inigo Ros -- The lexis and grammar of explicit evaluation in academic book reviews, 1913 and 1993 / Philip Shaw. | |
| 520 | _aSummary from OCLC: Academic criticism can be highly fraught and threatening, potentially wounding to the reviewed author and disruptive to the discipline, but it occurs routinely in review genres. This book explores how academics publically evaluate each others' work. Focusing on blurbs, book reviews, review articles, and literature reviews, the international contributors to the volume show how writers manage to critically engage with others' ideas, argue their own viewpoints, and establish academic credibility while simultaneously navigating these risky interactions. | ||
| 590 | _aCveAsig: 40069; | ||
| 590 | _aProgEdu: 79001; | ||
| 590 | _aAresCon: SOCIALES; | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_aEscritos académicos. _2lemb |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aCrítica literaria. _2lemb |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aAcademic writing _xReviews. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aBook reviewing. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aCriticism. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aHyland, Ken. _eed. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aDiani, Giuliana. _eed. |
|
| 942 | _cLIBRO | ||
| 999 |
_c213520 _d213520 |
||