000			04673nam a22002417a 4500
003			MX-MeUAM
005			20230216105146.0
008			191031s2019 mx ||||fo||d| 00| 0 spa d
040			_cMX-MeUAM _bspa _aMX-MeUAM
050		4	_aTK7872 .D48 _bI27 2019
100	1		_aIbarra Esquer, Jorge Eduardo _926330
245	1	0	_aCategorization framework for data objects in the Internet of things _h[recurso electrónico] / _cJorge Eduardo Ibarra Esquer ; director, Félix Fernando González Navarro
260			_aMexicali, Baja California, _c2019
300			_a1 recurso en línea, 87 p. ; _bil. col.
500			_aMaestría y Doctorado en Ciencias e Ingeniería
502			_aTesis (Doctorado) --Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Ingeniería, Mexicali, 2019.
520			_aBoth the idea and technology for connecting sensors and actuators to a network to remotely monitor and control physical systems have been known for many years and developed accordingly. However, a little more than a decade ago the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) was coined and used to integrate such approaches into a common framework. Technology has been constantly evolving and so has the concept of the Internet of Things, incorporating new terminology appropriate to technological advances and different application domains. This document presents the changes that the IoT has undertaken since its conception and research on how technological advances have shaped it and fostered the arising of derived names suitable to specific domains. A two-step literature review through major publishers and indexing databases was conducted; first by searching for proposals on the Internet of Things concept and analyzing them to find similarities, differences, and technological features that allow us to create a timeline showing its development; in the second step the most mentioned names given to the IoT for specific domains, as well as closely related concepts were identified and briefly analyzed. The study confirms the claim that a consensus on the IoT definition has not yet been reached, as enabling technology keeps evolving and new application domains are being proposed. However, recent changes have been relatively moderated, and its variations on application domains are clearly differentiated, with data and data technologies playing an important role in the IoT landscape. In addition, the study allowed us to obtain a clearer insight on this technology and what can be achieved through it. Observing the way these definitions have evolved and how different concepts, technologies and ideas have been incorporated as the IoT develops suggests that a correct description and characterization of the things at the end-points of the IoT should be one of the first goals towards a final definition. Things are the core of the IoT and must be properly characterized according to the different functions they accomplish. Identifying their capabilities and combining them as sets provides a view on the single or joint properties of existing things and guiding in properly designing and building new things while maximizing their potential benefits within an IoT. Building on five essential but independent capabilities of things (identification, location and tracking, sensing, actuation, and processing), four categories or groups of things are defined. These groups comprise the diversity of objects found in the IoT, as trackable, data, interactive, or smart objects. A description of the aforementioned capabilities is presented, stating how each of the groups of objects includes them. Then, given that data is one of the most important assets for both organizations and individuals a further description of the data objects group is made, proposing a categorization framework that thoroughly describes and measures the level in which each of these capabilities is contained and how it contributes to the performance and data properties of any data object. The framework has the capability of allowing IoT solution designers and providers understand the scope and outcomes of both IoT products and projects. It can be used to categorize both existing objects and new objects before they are constructed, which is where designers would benefit most from it.
650		4	_aRedes de sensores _vTesis y disertaciones académicas _xDiseño y construcción
700	1		_aGonzález Navarro, Félix Fernando _edir. _914607
710	2		_aUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California. _bInstituto de Ingeniería _93321
856	4		_uhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=1kfd4BBxnpRMWB0wiRCUQPsQEwvSoNYTO _zTesis Digital
942			_cTESIS
999			_c235991 _d235990