Artistic Judgement [recurso electrónico] : A Framework for Philosophical Aesthetics / by Graham McFee.

Preface -- Chapter One: The Artistic and The Aesthetic: A Distinction Considered. - 1.1 A crucial distinction -- 1.2 Transfiguration and artistic properties- 1.3 Some corollaries of the distinction -- 1.4 Contrasting views of the aesthetic -- 1.5 The artistic as sensuous?- 1.6The ‘ambiguity’ of artistic properties -- 1.7 An example: the case of Marla -- 1.8 Exploring the contrast: methodology -- 1.9 Outline of this work -- 1.10 On not defining art -- Chapter Two: Art, Meaning and Occasion-Sensitivity -- 2.1 Meaning meaning -- 2.2 Exceptions (a): dealing with defeasibility -- 2.3 Exceptions (b): disambiguation?- 2.4 An occasion-sensitive view of meaning and understanding -- 2.5 Contextualism in philosophical aesthetics -- 2.6 Competent judges -- 2.7 Meaning, explaining, and artistic properties -- 2.8 Meaning, explanation and content -- 2.9 The context of philosophical aesthetics -- Chapter Three: Art and Life-Issues: Meeting Counter-Cases -- 3.1 Artistic value and life-issues -- 3.2 Life-issues connection to artworks?- 3.3 The importance of life-issues -- 3.4. Learning from art?- 3.5 Art and moral value: moderate moralism, ethicism -- 3.6 A seven-part strategy -- 3.7 Literary value and moral understanding: Nussbaum -- 3.8 A conflict between morality and art?- 3.9 Conclusion -- Chapter Four: Intention, Authorship and Artistic Realism -- 4.1 The intention of the artist -- 4.2 Excursus: Hypothetical intentionalism and its discontents -- 4.3 The embodiment of artistic meaning -- 4.4 Making meaning: the concept “art” -- 4.5 Making sense: ‘history of production’ -- 4.6 Response-reliance and artistic properties -- 4.7 Understanding and criticism -- 4.8 Criticism and inference -- 4.9 The ‘reality’ of artistic properties -- Chapter Five: The Historical Character of Art -- 5.1 Precursors and the past -- 5.2 Art, change of meaning and standard historicism -- 5.3 Forward retroactivism, and the threat of misperception -- 5.4 Are these genuine properties?- 5.5 Reasons and ‘new evidence’ -- 5.6 Are these new properties?- 5.7 Making sense of the past -- 5.8 Oeuvre, action and understanding -- 5.9 Genre and artistic intention -- 5.10 An argument against any historicism -- 5.11 Historical character and understanding — some realism -- Chapter Six: The Republic of Art: A Plausible Institutional Account of Art?- 6.1 The idea of an institutional concept -- 6.2 Sketch of an institutional account of art -- 6.3 A more plausible (than Dickie’s) account of art -- 6.4 Topics for criticism -- 6.5 Does Dickie’s later theory fare better?- 6.6 Wollheim’s criticism -- 6.7 Critical reflections -- 6.8 Can the institution be wrong?- 6.9 The Friends of Jones. 6.10 What the account offers. Chapter Seven: Conclusion -- 7.1 The framework: a summary -- 7.2 The aesthetic reconsidered -- 7.3 Envoi: The Muscular Aesthetic.

Artistic Judgement sketches a framework for an account of art suitable to philosophical aesthetics. It stresses differences between artworks and other things; and locates the understanding of artworks both in a narrative of the history of art and in the institutional practices of the art world. Hence its distinctiveness lies in its strong account of the difference between, on the one hand, the judgement and appreciation of art and, on the other, the judgement and appreciation of all the other things in which we take an aesthetic interest. For only by acknowledging this contrast can one do justice to the importance regularly ascribed to art. The contrast is explained by appealing to an occasion-sensitive account of understanding, drawn from Charles Travis directly, but with Gordon Baker (and Wittgenstein) as also proximate rather than remote. On this basis, it argues, first, that we need to offer accounts of key topics only as far as questions might be raised in respect of them (hence, not exceptionlessly); and, second, that we should therefore defend the view that the meaning of artworks can be changed by later events (the historical character of art, or forward retroactivism) and that art has an institutional character, understood broadly on the lines of Terry Diffey’s Republic of Art. Besides providing a general framework, Artistic Judgement also explores the applications of the ideas to specific artworks or classes of them.

19